Tag Archive for: Decolonization

You are here: / Decolonization

Posts

Reimagining Our Relationship with Natural Resources: A Path Toward Climate Resilience through Natural Law and Decommodification

,

Introduction: A Warning and a Call for Transformation

In an era of ecological crisis and climate disruption, it is increasingly clear that the colonial constructs that define our current economic systems—especially those that reduce the natural world to commodities—are no longer sustainable. As humanity grapples with climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem collapse, we are called to rethink how we understand the value of nature. This is not a moment for fear but for hope rooted in responsibility. The time has come to reconstitute new forms of recognition for natural resources—forms that draw from natural law and Indigenous worldviews and move us toward decommodification processes.

Understanding Natural Law: A Foundation for Balance and Reciprocity

 In many Indigenous traditions, natural law is a set of guiding principles that govern the relationships between all beings—human and non-human. It is rooted in observation, interdependence, respect, and responsibility. Natural law recognizes that humans are not above nature but are part of it and that every element of the natural world holds intrinsic value beyond economic worth.

In contrast to colonial legal and economic systems prioritizing ownership, control, and extraction, natural law prioritizes relationality, responsibility, and continuity. It is about living by the rhythms and rules of Mother Earth rather than trying to dominate them.

Lumber and Natural Law: A New Way to Value Forests

Take the Canadian lumber industry as an example. Under colonial economic systems, forests are measured by board feet, market value, and export potential. Trees are seen as units of production.

Under natural law, however, a forest is not just timber—it is a living ecosystem. It provides medicines, oxygen, shelter, cultural teachings, and spiritual connection. Decommodifying lumber means recognizing and protecting these broader values. It could involve setting harvest limits based on ecological regeneration, requiring community-governed stewardship, or embedding cultural protocols and consent in forestry operations. This approach would align extractive industries with the natural cycles and laws of the territories in which they operate.

What Happens If We Don’t Change? A Vision of 50 Years Without Decommodification

 If we fail to implement decommodification processes, the next 50 years may see natural resources pushed beyond their limits:

  • Forests depleted beyond regeneration, triggering mass species extinction.
  • Waterways are poisoned or privatized, denying future generations access to clean water.
  • Sacred sites are destroyed for short-term gains.
  • Climate systems pushed into irreversible tipping points, affecting global food security, migration, and public health.

Without intentional change, our value systems will prioritize profit over planetary survival.

Decommodification as Policy: What Could It Look Like?

 Decommodification doesn’t mean halting all use of natural resources—it means rethinking how we value and manage them. Policies rooted in natural law could include:

  • Community-Led Stewardship Models: Return governance of lands and resources to Indigenous Nations and local communities.
  • Ecological Carrying Capacity Laws: Mandate that extraction levels stay within nature’s regenerating ability.
  • Cultural Impact Assessments: Alongside environmental reviews, evaluate resource projects’ cultural and spiritual impacts.
  • Rights of Nature Legislation: Recognize rivers, forests, and ecosystems as legal persons with rights to thrive.
  • Circular and Regenerative Economies: Design systems that reuse, restore, and regenerate rather than extract and discard.

Each of these policies would build toward an economy that is aligned with rather than in opposition to the Earth’s well-being.

Technology and Innovation: A Partner in Responsibility

 When aligned with values of responsibility and sustainability, technology can support a future of balanced resource use. Imagine:

  • Biomaterials replacing fossil fuels.
  • AI and data analytics monitoring ecosystem health in real-time.
  • Traditional Knowledge databases informing climate-smart agriculture.
  • Clean energy grids co-designed by Indigenous communities.

Technological innovation can either accelerate the destruction of nature—or help us restore and protect it. The choice lies in the values we embed within our systems.

Decommodification and Climate Action: Mitigation and Adaptation

 Decommodification of natural resources is not just a philosophical shift—it is a practical strategy for climate change mitigation and adaptation:

  • Mitigation: Reduced extraction and emissions through regenerative systems.
  • Adaptation: Stronger community resilience through land-based governance and ecological health.
  • Equity: Ensuring all peoples, especially Indigenous Nations, have agency in climate solutions.

By recognizing that nature is not a commodity but a relation, we build the cultural, spiritual, and ecological foundations for long-term resilience.

A Shared Future Rooted in Respect

The consequences will be severe if we continue to commodify and exploit nature. But if we reimagine our relationship to the Earth through natural law, decommodify our policies and economies, and act with love for future generations—for all our relations—we can create a just, thriving future.

Now is the time to ask: What do we value? And how will we ensure that our grandchildren and their grandchildren inherit a planet where they can live well, in balance, and in beauty?

 

By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

 

(Image Credit: Fellipe Ditadi, Unsplash+, licensed image)

/by

Decolonizing Urban and Regional Planning: Haudenosaunee Knowledge, Stewardship, and Climate Adaptation

,

As an Indigenous geography scholar and researcher, I increasingly focus on the realities of climate change and its profound impact on ecology. In a recent class I co-instructed at the Queen’s University School of Urban and Regional Planning, I introduced students to ancestral Indigenous planning, centring on a 12th-century Iroquoian community model. The discussion illuminated how human interactions with the land and natural resources were determinants of community planning and fundamental to sustaining the delicate balance of human and non-human relations.

Exploring the interrelationship of people and place through the cultural geography of the Haudenosaunee, we delved into how identity itself is shaped by land and its natural actors. For a class filled with aspiring urban and regional planners—along with three practicing city planners—the experience was transformative. It quickly became apparent that planning must move beyond rigid zoning practices and embrace place-based autonomy, where decision-making aligns with the rhythms and needs of the land itself.

Haudenosaunee Knowledge and Climate Adaptation

The prevailing mindset in modern urban and regional planning has long been dictated by frameworks rooted in industrialization, urban sprawl, and resource extraction. Much of the profession adheres to highly regulated, standardized practices that prioritize short-term economic gain over long-term environmental sustainability. Yet Indigenous planning offers a profound alternative that considers the interconnectedness of people, land, and ecological cycles.

This perspective challenges the conventional notion that humans design space for habitation; instead, it asserts that we must enhance and harmonize with the natural rhythms of place. When we examined Haudenosaunee planning principles, students responded with genuine curiosity and awe. Concepts such as ensuring the autonomy of water sources were central to settlement adaptation, using topography for protection, and identifying prime lands for cultivation were revelatory for many.

The more students engaged with this knowledge, the more they recognized that contemporary urban and regional planning must evolve to address the growing need for sustainable living. Climate change is no longer a future concern—it is here and reshaping our landscapes. If planners and policymakers fail to integrate climate adaptation and Indigenous value systems into their frameworks, they risk perpetuating unsustainable models that continue to degrade the environment.

The Iroquoian Longhouse: A Model for Sustainable Design

A compelling example of Indigenous planning is the Iroquoian longhouse, a structure that served as both shelter and a communal space. Built from natural materials such as elm bark, the longhouse was constructed with deep respect for the land—only taking what was necessary, ensuring sustainability, and allowing trees to replenish. The longhouse’s design reflected a life-cycle systems approach; structures were built for 30 to 40 years before being returned to the earth, where they naturally decomposed and reintegrated into the landscape.

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons (‘Exterior View of Traditional Iroquois Longhouse’).

The students were fascinated by the idea that communal spaces were designed with a finite yet renewable existence. In contrast, modern urban development often prioritizes permanence and expansion, creating structures that outlive their usefulness, contributing to urban decay and environmental strain. What if, instead, our urban centers were designed with adaptability in mind? What if materials used in construction aligned with ecological cycles rather than being treated as disposable waste?

The Power of Education in Transforming Urban Planning

Education systems are critical in fostering openness to new ideas and methodologies. However, much of the current urban planning curriculum is rooted in post-war suburban development models emphasizing efficiency, uniformity, and mass production. Integrating Indigenous value systems, environmental determinants, and climate change considerations into planning education is essential in fostering a holistic, future-focused approach to community development.

The challenge, of course, lies in decolonizing the profession itself. Innovation in urban and regional planning is often stifled in favour of “tried and true” practices prioritizing economic stability over ecological well-being. Yet, if planners are to truly serve the needs of future generations, they must expand their thinking beyond conventional models. Indigenous planning philosophies, such as those practiced by the Haudenosaunee, represent just one of the hundreds of cultural contributions that can help reshape human-centred design into more inclusive and regenerative.

A Call to Action: Expanding Thought, Embracing Change

If climate change is to be effectively addressed in community development, it must be at the forefront of planning discussions, not an afterthought. Recognizing the significance of place-based planning, environmental stewardship, and Indigenous knowledge systems is not an elective enhancement but a necessary revolution.

Urban and regional planning must evolve beyond rigid regulations and embrace the knowledge that has sustained Indigenous communities for millennia. The interconnectedness of land, water, climate, and human habitation must become central to planning efforts. This requires an intentional shift in education that welcomes new perspectives, cultural inclusivity, and Indigenous methodologies as fundamental learning components. It is not merely about integrating Indigenous knowledge for inclusion but about recognizing its profound value in creating sustainable, resilient, and thriving communities.

In the face of climate change, the question is no longer whether we need change but whether we are willing to embrace it. The wisdom of Indigenous planning offers a pathway forward, one rooted in reciprocity, sustainability, and deep respect for the land. Now is the time to expand our thinking, decolonize our approaches, and integrate climate consciousness into planning.

For the future of our communities, ecosystems, and generations, we must choose transformation over stagnation, reciprocity over exploitation, and sustainability over short-term convenience.

 

– By Rye Karonhiwanen Barberstock

 

(Header Image Credit: A.C., Licenced, Unsplash+)

/by

Creating Pathways to Indigenous-led Climate Policy in Canada

,

How can climate policy be more inclusive of Indigenous rights and knowledge systems, while working toward reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples? Principles for creating ethical spaces and recognizing the Treaty and constitutionally-protected rights of Indigenous peoples are two ways to elevate Indigenous perspectives, knowledge, and approaches to climate mitigation and adaptation policies.

“We Rise Together,” the 2018 report by The Indigenous Circle of Experts (ICE), describes ethical space as “a venue for collaboration and advice, sharing and cross-validation (where one side validates the other).” Ethical spaces create environments where Indigenous and non-Indigenous systems of knowledge can interact, through mutual respect, kindness, and generosity, to generate an exchange of values. There is a difference between the idea of the ethical space, and the practice of it: “[w]hile agreeing to formally enter ethical space may be straightforward for most parties, actually being within that space together requires flexibility.”

Historical legacies of colonialism prevent Indigenous-led solutions for climate change from being effectively implemented. Consequently, researchers propose calls to action to facilitate Indigenous-led climate mitigation and adaptation policies in Canada; these actions include how climate policy must:

  • prioritize human relationships with land and rebalance the relationship between people and Mother Earth.
  • prioritize Indigenous knowledge systems and equally consider diverse knowledge systems.
  • be multidimensional in order to also advance decarbonization and decolonization.
  • position Indigenous peoples as leaders from diverse nations, having inherent rights to self-determination.
  • be forward-thinking, and promote the well-being of Indigenous peoples.

 

By Leela Viswanathan

 

(Image Credit: Lili Popper, Unsplash)

/by